And that reason is technique.
What is it that the 700+ scorers do that’s so different?
Rather, knowing the multiplication tables and fraction-decimal equivalents cold plus understanding quick ways to estimate based on the answer choices, the top scorers know a bunch of shortcuts that–while they do dramatically shorten calculation–don’t reduce accuracy.
How do you know what’s responsible and what’s not? How to estimate properly and when you’re off-track? A lot of that depends on the structure of both the questions and the answer choices. What I’d suggest is to read more in the guide I’m offering here.
Here’s what you get for that excellent price: four GMAT-specific techniques used by the test’s writers to make the questions on one hand confusing–but on the other hand easily solved–complete with eight video demonstrations to back up the theory.
This will give you a tremendous benefit not only in time saved, but even more, a window into how the testwriters think.
Remember, your target GMAT score is possible: you just need to work smart as well as work hard!
OK, that’s not computer adaptive. Wrong image, sorry.
Weaken questions almost always get broken by asking "how is it possible that the Conclusion…
The thing to notice here is that every even number has a 2 in it.…
[latexpage] The function f is defined for each positive three-digit integer n by $f(n) =…
Look at what you're trying to do: reduce the amount of ash by reducing the…